SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL v. ABRAM SAIBO & CO.


The Attorney General V. Abram Saibo & Co.,

[FULL BENCH.]

1915.
Present  : Ennis, Shaw, and De Sampayo JJ.

THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL v. ABRAM SAIBO & CO.

369-D. C. Colombo, 35,575.

Contract for the tale of goods-Consideration-English law-Roman-Dutch law-Implied covenant-Penalty.

It was agreed, inter alia, between the General Manager of the Ceylon Government Railway and the defendant that defendant should supply rice for one year at a specified price " in such quantities as may from time to time be required for the general service of the railway "; that the deliveries should be made upon orders signed by the Railway Storekeeper; that the General Manager should pay for the rice supplied on the 15th day of the month following the delivery; that should the defendant fail to supply the rice ordered the General Manager should be at liberty to purchase elsewhere, and the defendant should pay a certain, penalty for such default, and also pay as damages the difference between the agreed price and the price at which the General Manage; bought the rice elsewhere. The defendant supplied rice for a few months and then made default. The Attorney-General sued defendant for dama








































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top