MARIKAR v. NATCHIA
1915. Present
: Ennis J. and De Sampayo J.
MARIKAR v. NATCHIA.
94-D. C. Puttalam, 359.
Muhamadan low-Intestate dying tenting widow, female children of paternal uncles,
and agnate grandsons of paternal uncles-" Residuary ''-" Sharer."
Under the Muhammadan law, in default of nearer male agnates, the paternal
uncles' sons' sons, how low soever, are entitled to the residuary estate to the
exclusion of female agnates more remote
than sisters.
The Ceylon Muhammadan Code appears to make no provision for intestate succession other than to set out the shares of those
entitled as " sharers," It contains no provision for the distribution
of residuary estate.
The paternal nudes' agnate grandchildren are " residuaries."
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayewardene, for appellant.
Drieberg, for respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
October 6, 1915. Ennis J.-
This is a question of succession under Ceylon Muhammadan law, The intestate died
leaving surviving him a widow, three female children of paternal uncles, of whom
the intervenient appellant is one, end agnate grandsons of paternal uncles. The
paternal uncles' grandsons claim the residuary esta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.