SIRIATTU v. RAN MENIKA
Present :
Wood Renton C.J. and Shaw J. 1915.
SIRIATTU v. RAN MENIKA.
102-D. C. Kurunegala, 5,342.
Vendor and purchaser-Land sold free from encumbrances-Purchaser unable to obtain
possession owing to existence of a usufructuary mortgage-Rescission of sale.
Defendants sold to plaintiffs a land, covenanting that it was free from all
encumbrances; but in point of fact it was subject to a usufructuary mortgage,
and the plaintiffs were unable to obtain physical possession.
Held (over-ruling the objection that the existence of such an encumbrance was
not a defect in the thing sold, and constituted no ground for the rescission of
the sale, but merely entitled the purchaser, on paying off the mortgage, to
recover the amount and incidental expenses as compensation from his vender),
that the plaintiffs were entitled to a rescission of the sale.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayewardene, for the defendants, appellants.
No appearance for the plaintiffs, respondents.
Cur. adv. vult.
June 7, 1915. WOOD RENTON C.J.-
This case raises an interesting point of law. The defendants sold to the
plaintiffs the field described in the pla
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.