FERNANDO et al. v. FERNANDO et al.
1916. Present: Shaw J.
and De Sampayo J.
FERNANDO et al. v. FERNANDO et al.
113-D, C. Kalutara, 6,141.
Buddhist Temporalities
Ordinance, s. 17-Action by trustee before giving security as trustee-Non-joinder
of all trustees.
Plaintiffs, who were two out of three trustees of a temple, sued the defendants
for damages, for wrongfully drawing toddy from trees belonging to the temple. At
the date of the institution of the action plaintiffs had not given security as
trustees.
Held, that they had status to bring the action.
It in not conditional to the appointment of a trustee that he should give
security although, probably, a trustee who fails to give security, when such has
been determined on by the Committee, may be removed from office under the
provision of the Ordinance.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment of Shaw J.
M, W. H. de Silva, for plaintiffs, appellants.-The plaintiffs were duly
appointed trustees at the time they brought the action. Security is in the
discretion of the District Committee, and not necessary for the validity of the
appointment. If we were to read section 17 in the sense of security being
imp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.