KIRI MENIKA v. RAN MENIKA
1916. Present: Wood
Renton C.J. and De Sampayo J.
KIRI MENIKA v. RAN MENIKA.
36-D. C. (Inty.) Kurunegala, 1,295.
Kandyan law-Person dying
childless-Acquired property-Intestate succession-Does a niece exclude the
widow?-Rule when widow is ewessa cousin of husband-Rule as to movable property.
Under the Kandyan law, where a person dies childless, the widow is entitled to
the movable property, except heirlooms.
As regards landed property, the general rule is that the widow is excluded by
the deceased's parents and brothers and sisters and their issue, but she has the
same life interest in her husband's acquired and hereditary property as the
widow of a husband who died leaving issue. If the barren widow be the husband's
paternal aunt's daughter or his maternal uncle's daughter, she inherits next to
full brothers the acquired lands.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayewardene, for appellant.
Bawa, K. C, for respondent.
Cur. adv. vult.
May 23, 1916. DE SAMPAYO J.-
This appeal raises an interesting point of Kandyan law under the following
circumstances. Ukku Banda died intestate and issueless, and letters of
admini
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.