SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

FERNANDO v. PIERIS


Fernando V. Pieris

1916 Present : Shaw A.C.J.

FERNANDO v. PIERIS.

221-C. R. Colombo, 50,412,

Action far damages for illegal arrest-Malice-Arrest of one person on warrant obtained against another.

Malice is immaterial in an action for damages for illegal arrest.

" The appellant was not, and never had been, known as M. T. Fernando, and his arrest on a warrant against such a person was illegal."

THE facts appear from the judgment.

M. W. H. de Silva, for appellant.-The warrant on which the appellant has been arrested is directed against Manadewage Thegis Fernando. The appellant has never been known by that name. The respondent is merely an executive officer, who should execute

the warrant against the person named. He cannot arrest some other on the ground that the warrant was meant against that other,  though in fact it was so meant (Hoye v. Bush1[1 M. & G. 775.]). 

There has been malice in this instance; even otherwise the defendant is liable (De Alwis v. Murugappa Chetty2[(1909) 12 N. L. R. 353.]).

No appearance for respondent.

September 11, 1916. SHAW A.C.J.-

The appellant sued the defendant, who is the Police Vidane of Watarappola, for damages of ill









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top