FERNANDO v. PIERIS
1916 Present : Shaw
A.C.J.
FERNANDO v. PIERIS.
221-C. R. Colombo, 50,412,
Action far damages for illegal
arrest-Malice-Arrest of one person on warrant obtained against another.
Malice is immaterial in an action for damages for illegal arrest.
" The appellant was not, and never had been, known as M. T. Fernando, and his
arrest on a warrant against such a person was illegal."
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
M. W. H. de Silva, for appellant.-The warrant on which the appellant has been
arrested is directed against Manadewage Thegis Fernando. The appellant has never
been known by that name. The respondent is merely an executive officer, who
should execute
the warrant against the person
named. He cannot arrest some other on the ground that the warrant was meant
against that other, though in fact it was so meant (Hoye v. Bush1[1 M. &
G. 775.]).
There has been malice in this instance; even otherwise the defendant is liable
(De Alwis v. Murugappa Chetty2[(1909) 12 N. L. R. 353.]).
No appearance for respondent.
September 11, 1916. SHAW A.C.J.-
The appellant sued the defendant, who is the Police Vidane of Watarappola, for
damages of ill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.