SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

APPUHAMY v. GUNASEKERA


Appuhamy V. Gunasekera

1916 Present : De Sampayo J.

APPUHAMY v. GUNASEKERA.

165-C. R. Negombo, 23,452.

Mortgage-Transfer of mortgaged property to several persons-Division of mortgaged property by transferees-Sale in execution of one transferee's portion.

A mortgage is indivisible, and a mortgagee has a right to realize the debt out of the whole or any part of the security without reference to the fact that the property has since been divided and passed into several hands-. The result is the same if several things are mortgaged for the same debt and they subsequently come into the possession of several persons, such as heirs or alienees of the mortgagor. In all such cases the person who pays the debt when the creditor has brought the hypothecary action may have recourse against the others for contribution. The mortgage being indivisible, all those to whom the mortgaged property come are in the position of co-obligors.

THE facts are set out in the judgment.

Aserappa, for defendant, appellant.

J. S. Jayewardene, for plaintiff, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

June, 27, 1916. DE SAMPAYO J.-

This action for contribution has been brought under the following circu






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top