SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAPOOR UMMA v. OMERDEEN


Sapoor Umma V. Omerdeen

1917 Present: Ennis J. and De Sampayo J.

SAPOOR UMMA v. OMERDEEN.

176-D. C. Colombo, 5,682.

Muhammadan law-Intestate succession-Person dying leaving filter and cousins-" Poor."

Under the Muhammadan law, where a person dies leaving a sister and cousins (sons of a paternal uncle), the sister inherits the half and the cousins the remaining half.

THE facts are set out in the judgment.

Bawa (with him Abdul Coder), for appellant.

Wadsworth (with him Ismail), for respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

February 15, 1917. ENNIS J.-

This appeal raises a question of the Muhammadan law of succession. The deceased died leaving (1) a sister, the petitioner, and (2) cousins, sons of a paternal uncle. It is not disputed that the sister, the appellant, is entitled to half of the deceased's property as her " share "; she, however, claims the remaining half.

Article 56 of the Muhammadan Code of 1806 provides: " if the deceased has left a sister she is entitled to the half, and the poor to the other half. " Article 102, second paragraph, says: " The shares allotted to the poor by several of the foregoing articles are not for the poor, but must go to the asew





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top