KING v. SENENAYAKE
Present: Wood Renton
C.J.
THE KING v. SENANAYAKE
251-D. C. (Crim.) Kurunegala, 3.859.
Joinder of
charges-Rioting-House-breaking-Entering the boutiques of three men-Evidence of
subsequent conduct of accused-Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 179,
180-Evidence Ordinance, s. 8.
Accused was charged with having committed house-breaking on Jane 4, 1915, during
the riots by entering into the boutiques of three men, with the intention, in
each case, of committing theft.
Held, that the joinder of three distinct charges of offences
committed against three different persons was not wrong.
"It is always open to the Court, on the application of an accused person against
whom that section is being applied, to order that the trial should be separate,
and any possible hardship may be obviated in that way."
In this case the District Judge admitted the evidence of certain witnesses, who
said that the accused was at the head of a mob two days after the
house-breaking.
Held, that, in the circumstances of this case, the evidence was
not inadmissible.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
H- J- C Pereira (with him J. W. de Silva), for accused, appellant.
Gre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.