SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. SENENAYAKE


King V. Senenayake

Present: Wood Renton C.J.

THE KING
v. SENANAYAKE

251-D. C. (Crim.) Kurunegala, 3.859.

    Joinder of charges-Rioting-House-breaking-Entering the boutiques of three men-Evidence of subsequent conduct of accused-Criminal  Procedure Code, ss. 179, 180-Evidence Ordinance, s. 8.

Accused was charged with having committed house-breaking on Jane 4, 1915, during the riots by entering into the boutiques of three men, with the intention, in each case, of committing theft.

Held, that the joinder of three distinct charges of offences committed against three different persons was not wrong.

"It is always open to the Court, on the application of an accused person against whom that section is being applied, to order that the trial should be separate, and any possible hardship may be obviated in that way."

In this case the District Judge admitted the evidence of certain witnesses, who said that the accused was at the head of a mob two days after the house-breaking.

Held, that, in the circumstances of this case, the evidence was not inadmissible.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

H- J- C Pereira (with him J. W. de Silva), for accused, appellant.

Gre















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top