SAVUNDRANAYAGAM et al. v. SAVUNDRANAYAGAM et al.
NLR20V274
1917 Present: Wood Renton C.J. and De Sampayo J.
SAVUNDRANAYAGAM et al. v. SAVUNDRANAYAGAM et al.
375-D. C. Jaffna, 9,706.
Tesawalamai-Colombo Chetty residing in Jaffna-Son born in and married to Jaffna
Tamil lady-Roman-Dutch law applicable.
S, who was born in Jaffna, and whose father was a Colombo Chetty, who had become
a permanent resident of Jaffna, was held (in the circumstances of this case) to
be governed by the Roman-Dutch law, and not by the Tesawalamai.
THIS
was an action for declaration of title to a half
share of a piece of land situated in Jaffna. The plaintiffs-appellants
claimed one-half by right of inheritance from their mother, who was the
first wife of G. P. Savundranayagam, who, the plaintiffs averred, was governed
by the Roman-Dutch law, and who married Plaintiffs mother in community of
property. Savundranayagam's
father was Tissera, who was a
Tamil born in Colombo-a member of the Chetty class. Tissera married Wilhelmina
Jurgan Ondatjee, who was a Tamil. The plaintiffs stated that she was also a
Colombo Chetty; the defendants asserted that she was " a Malabar inhabitant of
Jaffna " within the meaning of that term in the Regulation of 1806. Tissera and
his wife lived at Jaffna. The husband predeceased, leaving behind G. P.
Savundranayagam and another, Ariyanayagam. The land in dispute belonged to
Wilhelmina. Savundranayagam became a lawyer and practised at Trichinopoly, where
he died in 1882. He married twice, Jaffna Tamil ladies; both marriages were
prior to 1876. Plaintiffs are the children of the first bed, the defendants
children of the second bed.
The following issues were framed: -
(1) Was Wilhelmina Ondatjee a Malabar inhabitant of Jaffna as contemplated in
the regulation of 1806?
(2) Was Gabriel Tissera at the time of his marriage subject to the Tesawalamai?
(3) What would be the effect if only one of the two spouses was subject to the
Tesawalamai?
The learned District Judge, Dr. P. R. Pieris; after stating the facts, continued
as follows: -
Plaintiffs say that Gabriel Tissera having been a Colombo Chetty was governed by
the Roman-Dutch law, and therefore his son was governed by the same. The
defence say that Tissera by settling in Jaffna became subject to the
Tesawalamai, and that Savundranayagam was a Malabar, to whom the Tesawalamai
applied. It farther relies as an illustration, on the fact, which is well known,
that Tamils from India settle in Jaffna, and their descendants are absorbed
among the Jaffna Tamils, and are admittedly governed by the Tesawalamai.
By D 3 of 1824 the land to the west of land in dispute was purchased by
Wijeratne. Mudaliyar Bastiampulle, Madapally of Pandateripu. This fixes the fact
that the purchaser was a Jaffna Tamil. The purchaser having died, his son,
Wijeratne Mudaliyar, the husband of Lavinda Ondatjee (who was sister of
Wilhelmina), became the owner. Wijeratne died next, and his widow, Lavinda, was
appointed his administratrix. As such she, in 1845, gave a power of attorney, D
4, to her son Anthony, then living in Jaffnapatam, describing herself as of
Colombo. by this she, as administratrix, authorized the attorney to sell
the entirety of the land which belonged to her husband, specifically indicating
that what was sold belonged to the deceased husband. It is thus clear that she
was acting under the Tesawalamai, for otherwise, on the death of her husband,
half the land vested in herself, and only a moiety belonged to the estate. In D
4 the land in dispute is described as " the property of Wilhelmina Tissera." The
attorney, by 1> 2. sold the entirety to Wilhelmina, then the widow of
Gabriel, and living in Jaffna, and described the disputed land as "the house of
Tissera." Wilhelmina herself died shortly after, and her estate was administered
by the Secretary of this Court, who, by D 1 of 1850, sold what
Wilhelmina had bought from Wijer