SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAYAVICKREME et al. v. AMARASURIYA


Jayavickreme Et Al. V. Amarasuriya

[PRIVY COUNCIL.]

Present: Earl Loreburn, Lord Atkinson, Lord Scott Dickson, and Sir Arthur Channell.

JAYAWICKREME et al. v. AMARASURIYA.

D. C. Galle, 11,862.

    Consideration-Justa causa-Compromise of threatened action-Verbal agreement to pay money-Action to enforce the verbal agreement- Agreement enforceable, though the fist threatened action was not enforceable in late-Duty of Judge to frame proper issues on the facts proved at trial.

The plaintiff averred that the defendant held certain property received by him from his mother in trust for himself and the plaintiff in equal shares; that the plaintiff had threatened to institute against him a suit to compel him, in performance of that trust, to assign to her an undivided half share of this property; that after much negotiation an amicable settlement was arrived at on the terms following: first, that the plaintiff should refrain from instituting the contemplated action, and should not assert title to any share of the aforesaid properties; and secondly, that the defendant should in consideration thereof pay her a sum of Rs. 150,000 in five yearly instalments.

The Dist


















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top