JAYAVICKREME et al. v. AMARASURIYA
[PRIVY COUNCIL.]
Present: Earl Loreburn, Lord Atkinson, Lord Scott Dickson, and Sir Arthur
Channell.
JAYAWICKREME et al. v. AMARASURIYA.
D. C. Galle, 11,862.
Consideration-Justa causa-Compromise of threatened action-Verbal agreement to
pay money-Action to enforce the verbal agreement- Agreement enforceable, though
the fist threatened action was not enforceable in late-Duty of Judge to frame
proper issues on the facts proved at trial.
The plaintiff averred that the defendant held certain property received by him
from his mother in trust for himself and the plaintiff in equal shares; that the
plaintiff had threatened to institute against him a suit to compel him, in
performance of that trust, to assign to her an undivided half share of this
property; that after much negotiation an amicable settlement was arrived at on
the terms following: first, that the plaintiff should refrain from instituting
the contemplated action, and should not assert title to any share of the
aforesaid properties; and secondly, that the defendant should in consideration
thereof pay her a sum of Rs. 150,000 in five yearly instalments.
The Dist
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.