RUPASINGHE v. FERNANDO
1918 Present : De Sampayo J.
RUPASINGHE v. FEE NANDO.
35 and 36-C. R. Kalutara, 7,615.
Judgment against a minor-Seizure of property under writ-Claim
unsuccessful-Action under s.247, Civil Procedure Code-May
unsuccessful claimant attack the judgment sought to be executed as
invalid on the ground of minority of defendant?
In an action under section 247 of the Civil Procedure Code by an unsuccessful
claimant, the plaintiff and the representatives of the deceased judgment-debtor
attacked the validity of the judgment sought to be executed on the ground that
the judgment-debtor was a minor.
Held, the judgment entered against the minor, though unrepresented by a
guardian, was at most an irregularity, and that it was not. open to a collateral
attack. Though the plaintiff was not a party to that action, he cannot attack
the judgment in that case in this action under section 247.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayawardene for plaintiff appellant in appeal No. 35.
Bawa. K.C., for
added defendants, appellants in appeal No. 36.
Samarawickreme (with him Weeraratne), for the first defendant, respondent in
both appeals.
March 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.