SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RUPASINGHE v. FERNANDO


Rupasinghe V. Fernando

1918 Present : De Sampayo J.

RUPASINGHE v. FEE NANDO.

35 and 36-C. R. Kalutara, 7,615.

Judgment against a minor-Seizure of property under writ-Claim unsuccessful-Action under s.247, Civil Procedure Code-May unsuccessful claimant attack the judgment sought to be executed as invalid on the ground of minority of defendant?

In an action under section 247 of the Civil Procedure Code by an unsuccessful claimant, the plaintiff and the representatives of the deceased judgment-debtor attacked the validity of the judgment sought to be executed on the ground that the judgment-debtor was a minor.

Held, the judgment entered against the minor, though unrepresented by a guardian, was at most an irregularity, and that it was not. open to a collateral attack. Though the plaintiff was not a party to that action, he cannot attack the judgment in that case in this action under section 247.

THE facts are set out in the judgment.

A. St. V. Jayawardene for plaintiff appellant in appeal No. 35.

Bawa. K.C., for added defendants, appellants in appeal No. 36.

Samarawickreme (with him Weeraratne), for the first defendant, respondent in both appeals.

March 2








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top