FERNANDO v. DE MEL
Present: De Sampayo J. and Loos A.J.
1919
FERNANDO v. DE MEL et al.
143-D. C. Colombo, 47,785.
Surveyor appointed arbitrator in action,
for definition of boundaries- Payment of half of survey fee by one party before
commencing work-Misconduct.
An action for definition of boundaries was referred to a surveyor for
arbitration. When referring the matter to the arbitrator, the Court ordered that
the costs of arbitration should, in the first instance, be paid by both parties
in equal shares. Before he commenced his work, the arbitrator wrote to the
proctors on both sides to pay Rs. 75 for survey fees. The plaintiff paid Rs.
37.50. The defendants promised to pay, but did not do so.
Held, that in the circumstances the receiving of the fee from the
plaintiff only did not amount to misconduct.
Fernando v. Migel Appu 1 [1 (1913) 16 N. L. R. 157.]
considered.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
A. St. V. Jayawardene (with him Cooray), for plaintiff, appellant.
Bawa, K.C., for defendants, respondents.
March 20, 1919. De Sampayo J.-
The plaintiff and the first defendant (the wife of the sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.