SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. AMAN


King V. Aman

[FULL , BENCH.]

Present : Bertram C.J. and Ennis and De Sampayo JJ.

THE KING v. AMAN

219-D. C. (Crim.) Badulla 4,768.

Joinder of charges-Running amuck-Stabbing two persons-Criminal Procedure Code, s. 180.

The accused, who was drunk, bad an altercation with A, and stabbed him. Then he rushed along a crowded street, and about 30 yards off, seeing E, with whom he had an altercation the previous day, reminded him of the occurrence, and stabbed him also.

Held, that in the circumstances of this case the two acts were so connected together as to form the same transaction under section 180 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and he could be properly tried on one indictment.

BERTRAM C.J.-" The word ' transaction ' is sufficiently general to cover the case of a man who is reduced to a state of temporary frenzy by drunkenness or drugs, and in pursuance of the condition so generated runs along a street and commits a series of offences, sometimes inspired by one motive and sometimes by another, against persons with whom he comes face to face. "

THE facts appear from the judgment.

A. St. V. Jayawardene, for the appellant.

Garvin, S.-G. (with him Jansz, C.





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top