SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

APPUHAMY v. APPUHAMY


Appuhamy V. Appuhamy

1920. Present: De Sampayo J. and Loos A.J.

APPUHAMY v. APPUHAMY et al.,

364-D. C. Chilaw, 6,168.

Conspiracy to charge another falsely-Action for damages-Joinder of parties-Civil Procedure Code, s. 14-" In respect of the same cause . of action "-Actio injuriarum-False information to ' police-Action against informer though he did not institute criminal proceedings-Proof of conspiracy.

Where three persons conspired together to charge another falsely with an offence, all the three may be sued together in an action for damages.

The actio injuriarum may be brought against a person who with the necessary intent puts the law in motion, though he may not himself institute proceedings in the Court.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

H. J. C. Pereira,
for plaintiff, appellant.

A. St. V. Jayawardene, for defendants, respondents.

March 29, 1920. DE SAMPAYO J.-

The plaintiff brought this action for damages against the three defendants, alleging that they had conspired to charge the plaintiff .falsely with having shot and killed Martinu Thamel, and that in pursuance of their intent they maliciously gave false information to the police, in cons











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top