APPUHAMY v. APPUHAMY
1920. Present: De Sampayo J.
and Loos A.J.
APPUHAMY v. APPUHAMY et al.,
364-D. C. Chilaw, 6,168.
Conspiracy to charge another
falsely-Action for damages-Joinder of parties-Civil Procedure Code, s. 14-" In
respect of the same cause . of action "-Actio injuriarum-False information to '
police-Action against informer though he did not institute criminal
proceedings-Proof of conspiracy.
Where three persons conspired together to charge another falsely with an
offence, all the three may be sued together in an action for damages.
The actio injuriarum may be brought against a person who with the necessary
intent puts the law in motion, though he may not himself institute proceedings
in the Court.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
H. J. C. Pereira, for plaintiff, appellant.
A. St. V. Jayawardene, for defendants, respondents.
March 29, 1920. DE SAMPAYO J.-
The plaintiff brought this action for damages against the three defendants,
alleging that they had conspired to charge the plaintiff .falsely with having
shot and killed Martinu Thamel, and that in pursuance of their intent they
maliciously gave false information to the police, in cons
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.