SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. THAMBIPILLAI


King V. Thambipillai

[CROWN CASE RESERVED.]

1920 Present: Bertram C.J., De Sampayo J. and Schneider A.J.

THE KING v. THAMBIPILLAI.

P. C. Jaffna, 9,101.

No. 3, First Northern Circuit, 1920.

Murder by some of several persons-Accused acquitted as jury could not tell which of them committed the murder-Conviction for causing evidence to disappear-Penal Code, ss. 198 and 296.

The accused, who were all found carrying off a dead body, were charged with murder and under section 198 of the Penal Code, with having caused evidence of the commission of the offence to disappear. The jury was of opinion that one or more persons among the accused committed the murder, but they could not say which of them did it. The jury acquitted the accused on the charge of murder, and convicted them on the second count.

Held (De Sampayo dissentiente), that the conviction on the second count was not illegal.

BERTRAM C.J.-The evidence being the same in both cases, I see nothing unreasonable in the actual crime and the subsidiary offence being charged in the alternative, so that if the jury are not satisfied as to the former, they may at least convict the offender of the latter.

THIS
















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top