KING v. THAMBIPILLAI
[CROWN CASE RESERVED.]
1920 Present: Bertram C.J., De Sampayo J. and Schneider A.J.
THE KING v. THAMBIPILLAI.
P. C. Jaffna, 9,101.
No. 3, First Northern Circuit, 1920.
Murder by some of several
persons-Accused acquitted as jury could not tell which of them committed the
murder-Conviction for causing evidence to disappear-Penal Code, ss. 198 and 296.
The accused, who were all found carrying off a dead body, were charged with
murder and under section 198 of the Penal Code, with having caused evidence of
the commission of the offence to disappear. The jury was of opinion that one or
more persons among the accused committed the murder, but they could not say
which of them did it. The jury acquitted the accused on the charge of murder,
and convicted them on the second count.
Held (De Sampayo dissentiente), that the conviction on the second count
was not illegal.
BERTRAM C.J.-The evidence being the same in both cases, I see nothing
unreasonable in the actual crime and the subsidiary offence being charged in the
alternative, so that if the jury are not satisfied as to the former, they may at
least convict the offender of the latter.
THIS
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.