SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CROOS v. VINCENT


Croos V. Vincent

Present : Shaw J. and De Sampayo J. 1920

CROOS v. VINCENT.,

57-D.C. Negombo, 1,849.

Application by mother to be appointed guardian and curator-Should respondent be named ?-Mother guardian without authority from Court-Is she entitled to be curator at the same time ?

A mother is by law the natural guardian of her infant children, and is entitled to look after them and to have the custody of them as against all other people after the death of the father. It is unnecessary for a mother to apply to the Court for authority to be guardian.

The only thing necessary in her case is to obtain the management of the property of the infant children, and she is entitled to apply for this.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

Croos-Dabrera, for petitioner, appellant.-The practice has been not to make any party respondent to applications of this kind. The Code does not make it imperative that there should be a respondent to an application by way of summary procedure. There is no necessity to make a party respondent when the petitioner apprehends no opposition. There are cases where the Court has allowed applications by way of summary procedure without i









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top