CROOS v. VINCENT
Present : Shaw J.
and De Sampayo J. 1920
CROOS v. VINCENT.,
57-D.C. Negombo, 1,849.
Application by mother to be appointed guardian and curator-Should respondent be
named ?-Mother guardian without authority from Court-Is she entitled to be
curator at the same time ?
A mother is by law the natural guardian of her infant children, and is entitled
to look after them and to have the custody of them as against all other people
after the death of the father. It is unnecessary for a mother to apply to the
Court for authority to be guardian.
The only thing necessary in her case is to obtain the management of the property
of the infant children, and she is entitled to apply for this.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
Croos-Dabrera, for petitioner, appellant.-The practice has been not to make any
party respondent to applications of this kind. The Code does not make it
imperative that there should be a respondent to an application by way of
summary procedure. There is no necessity to make a party respondent when the
petitioner apprehends no opposition. There are cases where the Court has allowed
applications by way of summary procedure without i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.