SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WIJEGUNATILEKE v. JONI APPU


Wijegunatileke V. Joni Appu

Present : Bertram C.J. and Schneider A.J.   1920.

WIJEGUNATILEKE v. JONI APPU.

108-D. C. Kalutara, 8,394.

False statement made by a person before the police implicating another- Inquiry by police under Criminal Procedure Code, chapter XII.- Privilege-Action for damages-Malicious prosecution.

At a preliminary inquiry by the police under chapter XII. of the Criminal Procedure Code the defendant made a false statement to the police implicating the plaintiff in an affray.

Held, that as the statement was made on a privileged occasion, an action for damages did not lie against him.

THE facts appear from the judgment.

A. St. V. Jayawardene, for defendant, appellant.

H. J. C. Pereira, for plaintiff, respondent.

Cur. adv. vult.

December 2, 1920. BERTRAM C.J.-

I have read and agree with the judgment of Schneider A.J. I would only add that the conclusion of this Court appears to be in harmony with the principle observed in the Courts of South Africa. I cite the following passage from Nathan's Common Law of South Africa, vol. III., para. 1643, the case referred to not being available locally:-

"The defendant must have set the criminal law




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top