GUNAWARDENE v. PUNCHIRALA et al.
Present : De Sampayo J. 1921.
GUNAWARDENE v. PUNCHIRALA et al.
P. C. Kurunegala, 11,602.
Whipping-Theft of a bull-Jurisdiction of Police Court-Ordinance No. 4 of 1891.
A Police Court has no jurisdiction, except where the offender is a person under
sixteen years of age, to inflict whipping or lashes for theft of a bull under
section 368 of the Penal Code.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
M. W. H. de Silva, C.C., in support.
June 15, 1921. DE SAMPAYO J.-
In this case the accused was convicted of the offence of theft of a bull under
section 368 of the Penal Code. The Magistrate sentenced him to six months'
rigorous imprisonment and to receive twenty strokes with a rattan. The Penal
Code does provide for whipping in the case of offences under section 368. The
Police Court jurisdiction to inflict lashes is, however, limited. Under section
15 of the Criminal Procedure Code the Police Court is authorized to inflict
whipping if the offender is under sixteen years of age. That provision does not
apply in this case, because the accused person is not under that age, but is an
adult. The only other provision authorizing the Poli
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.