KING v. JORONIS
1921. Present :
Bertram C.J.
THE KING v. JORONIS et al.
4-P.C. Avissawella, 32,503.
Accused only witness for defence-Time for summing up by Crown Counsel -One of
several accused calling other witnesses-Time for summing up-Criminal Procedure
Code, ss. 234 and 235.
Where the only witness called for the defence is the accused himself, the
appropriate time for summing up of his case by counsel for the Crown is after
the accused has given evidence and before the reply of his own counsel.
If there is another person accused on the same indictment and that person calls
evidence (other than himself), the summing up of counsel for the Crown may be
postponed till the conclusion of the case for that other person, so that counsel
for the Crown may sum up as regards one accused person and reply as regards the
other in the same speech. In such a case the counsel who called no evidence but
his own client has the last word.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
Barber, C.C., for the Crown.
C. S. Rajaratnam (with him Senaratne), for first accused.
Georgesz, for second accused.
September 12, 1921. BERTRAM C.J.-
The question has arisen as to the point in a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.