KIRIMENIKA v. MENIKHAMY
1921. Present :
Bertram C.J.
KIRIMENIKA v. MENIKHAMY.
10-C. R. Ratnapura, 16,748.
Informal partition among members of a family-Adverse possession- Permissive
agreement-Possession of definite blocks for a long time-Presumption that
possession became adverse.
When members of a family make an informal but definite partition of their lands,
and each party enters into possession of his share, then the possession of the
several shareholders becomes adverse from the date of their doing so, and title
by prescription can be acquired.
Whore the arrangement is permissive, then each co-owner must be deemed as
possessing on behalf of himself and others, unless the arrangement continues so
long that on equitable grounds it is presumed that at some point it became
adverse. Such a presumption is only drawn upon a consideration of all the
circumstances of the case.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
R. L. Pereira, for appellant.
E. G. P. Jayatilake, for respondent.
July 18, 1921. BERTRAM C.J.-
This is a dispute between two members of a Kandyan family with regard to a land
which forms part of the family inheritance. It was at one time possess
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.