SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HENDRICK SINGHO v. KALANIS APPU et al


Hendrick Singho V. Kalanis Appu Et Al

 [FULL BENCH.]

1921
Present: Bertram C.J. and Ennis and Do Sampayo JJ,

HENDRICK SINGHO v. KALANIS APPU et al.

56-D. C. Kalutara, 9,493.

Civil Procedure Code, ss. 237, 238, 289- Seizure not registered-Sale by judgment-debtor after Fiscals sale and before issue of Fiscal's conveyance-Prior registration of conveyance in favour of private alienee-Does section 289 override the provisions of s. 238 ?- Relation back.

Section 289 of the Civil Procedure Code does not override the provisions of section 238; the title of the purchaser at the Fiscal's sale does not, on the issue of the Fiscal's conveyance, prevail over any intermediate alienation by the execution-debtor, unless the Fiscal's seizure was registered. ,

"If the seizure is not registered, the necessary implication of section 238 is that a bona fide private alienee is statim securus. Section 289, as regards relation back, must be read in the light of section 238, and its operation should not be extended to a case where the seizure has not been registered."

THE plaintiff, respondent, instituted this action for declaration . of title to lot 1 of a land called Imbalahena, wh





















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top