PERERA v. SINGHO
Present : De Sampayo J.
PERERA v. SINGHO et al.
1,098-1,102-P. C.Kalutara, 5,184.
Unlawful gaming-Gambling on an
open ground near the cooly line on an estate-Public roads passing through the,
estate-Public place.
The accused were found gambling on an open ground in front of a cooly line
on an estate.
Held, that the fact that public roads passed through the estate did not
make the place a public place.
THE
facts appear from the judgment. Zoysa, for appellants.
December 13,1921. DE SAMPAYO J.-
This is a prosecution under the Gaming Ordinance. Some eight persons, seven of
whom are Sinhalese, were charged with having carried on unlawful gaming on
Arapolakanda estate. The Tamil accused pleaded guilty. If he had not, he would
have been able to urge the same point which the appellants in this case urge in
defence. The point is whether they were gambling in a public place. The idea of
the place being kept as a gaming place is negatived, nor did the police enter
the premises with a warrant, so the prosecution had to depend on proof that the
place was one to which the public had access whether of right or not. Now, this Arapolakanda estate would
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.