SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SEDRIS v. SINGHO


Sedris V. Singho

[FULL BENCH.]

Present : Bertram C.J. and Ennis and De Sampayo JJ.

SEDRIS v. SINGHO.

797-P.C. Panadure, 71,293.

Village Tribunal-Exclusive jurisdiction-Petty thefts-When jurisdiction of Police Court is ousted-Ordinance No. 24 of 1889, ". 28 -Prosecution by police-Has Village Tribunal jurisdiction ?- " Native "-Crown.

The jurisdiction of a Police Court with regard to petty thefts is not ousted, unless it is shown, not only that the property stolen exceeds Rs. 20 in value, but also that the offence can be adequately punished by a Village Tribunal.

It is within the jurisdiction of a Police Magistrate to determine whether, in his opinion, the case is one which could adequately be dealt with by a Village Tribunal; it is not necessary that it should appear on the record that the Magistrate formally addressed himself to this question.

THE accused in this case was charged in the Police Court with theft of a bull valued at Rs. 18, and convicted. ENNIS J. referred the case to a Bench of three Judges.

E. W. Jayawardene (with him Navaratnam), for appellant.-

The jurisdiction conferred on Village Tribunals by section 28 of Ordinance No. 24 of 1889 is








































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top