KING v. ARNOLES
Present : Bertram
CJ. 1921
THE KING v. ARNOLIS.
139-D. C. Colombo, 5,928.
Theft- Accused charged with
dishonest retention of stolen property - Evidence of previous sales of stolen
Umber by accused-Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 182 and 408-Penal Code, s. 394.
Accused, who had agreed with a timber merchant to sell him a certain quantity of
timber, went with another person and opened a timber store belonging to Messrs.
Darley, Butler &, Co., and loaded carts with timber. He was promptly arrested at
the stores in the act, and was charged with dishonest retention of stolen
property under section 394 of the Penal Code.
Evidence was led at the trial to prove that he had sold timber belonging to
Messrs. Darley, Butler & Co. to others on previous occasions.
Held, that while the charge of dishonest retention was not appropriate to the
circumstances, it was open to the Court to convict the accused of theft under
section 182 of the Criminal Procedure Code.
The evidence of previous sales of stolen timber was admissible on the question
of theft. " This evidence was tendered under section 408 of the Criminal
Procedure Code in support of the charge of ret
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.