RAMANADEN v. FERNANDO et al.
Present : Bertram C.J. and De
Sampayo J.
RAMANADEN v. FERNANDO et al.
94-D. C. Negombo, 7,930.
Civil Procedure Code, s. 339
- Assignment of decree - The assignee becoming heir of one of the
judgment-debtors after assignment- Application by assignee to be substituted
plaintiff-Discretion of Court-Delay in making application-Prescription.
The second proviso to section 339 of the Civil Procedure Code, which enacts
that where a decree against several persons has been transferred to one of them
it shall not be executed against the others, does not apply to the case of an
assignee who becomes an heir of one of the debtors after the assignment.
The Court has a discretion as to the substitution of a plaintiff; where there
was considerable delay the Court referred the assignee to a separate action.
IN this
action the original plaintiff sued on a mortgage bond executed by Madalena
Fernando and Romel Gabriel Per era. The latter having died, the administratrix
of this estate, with Madalena, was sued in the above case. On March 9, 1910,
formal mortgage decree was entered against the defendants.
On October 15, 1910, the original plaint
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.