MUDIANSE et al. v. SIRIYA et al.
Present : Ennis J. and Garvin
A.J.
MUDIANSE et al. v. SIRIYA et al.
180-D. C. Kegalla, 5,717.
Action under a. 247-Plaint
returned for want of jurisdiction-Civil Procedure Code, a. 47-Subsequent
presentation of plaint to right Court-Date of action-Prescription.
Where a plaint returned to the plaintiff under section 47 of the Civil
Procedure Code for want of jurisdiction is presented subsequently to the right
Court, the plaint is not to be deemed to have been presented from the date of
the earlier presentation to the wrong Court.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment. Keuneman (with him Schokman), for defendants,
appellants. Canakaratne, for plaintiffs, respondents.
November 3, 1921. ENNIS J.-
This was an action under section 247 of the Civil Procedure Code.
It appears that the present defendants were successful in their claim in the
claim inquiry, the order in which was passed on September 30, 1919.
On October 10 the plaintiffs filed an action in the Court of Bequests. On
December 13 the defendants filed answer, in which they took exception to the
jurisdiction of the Court. On January 25, 1921, on the day fixed for tria
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.