KANDIAH v. PODISINGHO
Present : De Sampayo J.
KANDIAH v. PODISINGHO.
822-P. C. Trincomalee, 3,026.
Retaining stolen
property-Seasonable account given by accused-Burden of proof that the account is
false is on prosecution.
" When a man, in whose possession stolen property is found, gives a
reasonable account of how he came by it, as by telling the name of the person
from whom he received it, and who is known to be a real person, it is incumbent
on the prosecution to show that
account is false." .
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
H. J. C. Pereira, K.C. (with him J. Joseph), for appellant
The accused has given a reasonable explanation as to how he came by the articles
in question. In the face of that explanation, it is for the prosecution to prove
that it was false. The prosecution has failed to do that. The accused has stated
in evidence that the articles in question were deposited with him by one
Appuhamy, and has produced his account books in proof of his statement. The
learned Magistrate was wrong in holding that the accused had failed to prove
that the articles were left with him as security for a debt.
Counsel cited Regina v. Crawthurst [1] and Pe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.