SILVA v. LETCHIMAN CHETTY
1922 Present
: Ennis and Schneider
JJ.
SILVA v. LETCHIMAN CHETTY.
386-D. C. Negombo, 14,106.
Agreement to sell land
belonging to vendor and minor children-Consideration paid-Possession by
vendee-Adverse possession- Prescription.
A agreed to sell to B by deed in 1893 his share (one-twelfth) and the share
of his two minor children (one-twelfth) of a garden, and undertook to get the
minors to convey when they came of age. The deed recited that the two shares of
the garden were given over to B for possession and improvement from the date of
the execution of the agreement, and that A had received the full consideration.
B had possession ever since 1893 to date of action. The minors attained the age
of majority, twenty-one and fifteen years, before date of action, but did not
make any claim during these years.
Held, that B's possession was adverse, and that he had acquired title by
prescription to the share of the minors.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment. The deed of 1893 was as follows:-
No. 30,525.
Know all men by these presents that I, Warnakulasuriya Alensokuttige Dominikko Fernando of Second Division of Kurana, Bolawala
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.