JEERISHAMY v. DAVITH SINNO
Present : Ennis J.
JEERISHAMY v. DAVITH SINNO.
815-P. C. Tangalla. 766.
Maintenance-Application for
maintenance of children-Dismissal of application- as applicant was
absent-Subsequent application-- Res judicata-Does appeal He against refusal to
order maintenance.
The dismissal of an application for maintenance for children on the ground
that applicant was absent is no bar to a fresh application.
Where a subsequent application was dismissed without inquiry.
Held, that there was no appeal against the order. The applicant was
directed to make a fresh application in the Polite Court,
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
Soertsz, for the appellant. Keuneman, for the respondent.
September 6, 1921. ENNIS J.-
This is an appeal from an order refusing to grant an application for
maintenance.
It appears that the appellant had been in 1913 granted maintenance for herself
and one child at the rate of Rs. 12. 50 per month.
The counsel for the appellant contends that sometime afterwards the parties were
reconciled, and that two other children were born to them.
On April 20, 1920, the appellant applied for maintenance in respect of these tw
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.