SITHAMBARAM CHETTY v. THE KELANI VALLEY RUBBER
1922
Present : De Sampayo and
Schneider J.J.
SITHAMBARAM CHETTY v. THE KELANI VALLEY
RUBBER CO., LTD.
39-D. C. Colombo, 727.
Principal and agent-Authority
of superintendent of estate to borrow money on behalf of the estate.
The superintendent of an estate as such has no authority to borrow money on
behalf of his employer, or to pledge his credit, even for the purposes, of the
estate, unless such authority is expressly given, or can be implied from the
recognized coarse of dealing with third parties.
THE
facts appear from the judgment.
Hayley, for defendant company, appellant.
R. L. Pereira (with him M. W. H. de Silva), for plaintiff,
respondent.
September 7, 1922. DE SAMPAYO J.-
The plaintiff is a Chetty trader of Sea street, Colombo, having a branch
establishment at Yatiyantota. The defendant is the Kelani Valley Rubber Co. and
proprietor of Hathmathe estate, situated at Ruwanwella. At the time of the
transactions, on account of which this action is brought, the superintendent of
the estate, under the defendant company, was one E. H. Grigson, who has since
been dismissed from his employment.
The plaintiff
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.