MORAES v. NALLAN CHETTY
[FULL BENCH]
Present : Bertram C.J. and De Sampayo and Garvin JJ.
MORAES et al. v. NALLAN CHETTY. .
321-D. C. Kandy, 29,596.
Mortgage-Civil Procedure Code,
ss. 640-644-Address not registered by mortgagee-Sale by second mortgagee under
his decree-Second mortgagee not a party to action by first mortgagee-Is
purchaser at sale under decree of second mortgagee bound by the first mortgage?
Where a registered mortgagee did not register his address, and brought an
action on his bond without making a subsequent mortgagee a party, or giving him
notice of the action, and where the subsequent mortgagee obtained judgment on
his bond before the first mortgagee instituted his action, and sold in execution
the-mortgaged property before it was seized under the decree obtained by the
first mortgagee,-
Held, that the purchaser at the sale in execution under the decree
obtained by the second mortgagee took the property subject to the first
mortgage.
The effect of not registering address by primary mortgagee discussed.
Suppramaniam. Chetty v. Weerasekera[1 (1918) 30 N. L. R. 170.] considered.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment of the Chief Justice
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.