SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

WIJEWARDENE v. JAYAWARDENE


Wijewardene V. Jayawardene

1923 Present : Bertram C.J. and De Sampayo J.

WIJEWARDENE v. JAYAWARDENE.

289-D. C. Colombo, 45,217.

Surety-Beneficium excussionis-Creditor holds securities given by debtor in trust for surety-Surety discharged if securities become valueless owing to dilatoriness or act of creditor-Creditor can call upon surety to guarantee costs of excussion-Extent to which surety is discharged by misfeasance of creditor.

Where a surety has not renounced the beneficium  excussions. the creditor holds all securities given by the debtor in trust for the surety. The surety is discharged if the securities become valueless, not only by the dilatoriness of the creditor, but also by any act on his part; the act must not be a merely negligent act, but must be a positive act on the part of the creditor.

If a creditor can show that there is no reasonable hope of excussion being successful, he is to ask the surety to guarantee bis costs of excussion.

The extent to which surety is discharged by the misfeasance of the creditor considered.

THE facts are set out in the judgment.

Drieberg, K.C. (with him Hayley, Koch, and Canakeratne), for the defendant, app



















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top