WIJEWARDENE v. JAYAWARDENE
1923 Present
: Bertram
C.J. and De Sampayo J.
WIJEWARDENE v. JAYAWARDENE.
289-D. C. Colombo, 45,217.
Surety-Beneficium
excussionis-Creditor holds securities given by debtor in trust for surety-Surety
discharged if securities become valueless owing to dilatoriness or act of
creditor-Creditor can call upon surety to guarantee costs of excussion-Extent to
which surety is discharged by misfeasance of creditor.
Where a surety has not renounced the beneficium excussions. the creditor
holds all securities given by the debtor in trust for the surety. The surety is
discharged if the securities become valueless, not only by the dilatoriness of
the creditor, but also by any act on his part; the act must not be a merely
negligent act, but must be a positive act on the part of the creditor.
If a creditor can show that there is no reasonable hope of excussion being
successful, he is to ask the surety to guarantee bis costs of excussion.
The extent to which surety is discharged by the misfeasance of the creditor
considered.
THE
facts are set out in the judgment.
Drieberg, K.C. (with him Hayley, Koch, and Canakeratne), for the
defendant, app
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.