ROWEL v. PERERA
1922 Present: Bertram C.J.
ROWEL v. PERERA
385-P. C. Chilaw, 12,387
Criminal Procedure Code, s. 189-Time-limit on cross examination and
remarks-Right of pleader for defence to comment on evidence
led for prosecution.
A Magistrate has no power to impose a time-limit either on cross examination or
on the remarks of pleaders.
A pleader for the defence, when opening his case, may not only expound the
evidence he proposes to lead for the defence, bat may also comment on the
evidence led for the prosecution.
H. J. C. Pereira, K.C. (with him Batuwantudawa and Croos-Da Brera), for
appellant,
H. E, Garvin, for respondent.
August 24, 1922, BERTRAM C.J.-
I need not go into the facts of this case because it appears from the record
that while the proctor for the defence was addressing the Court for the purpose
of opening his case under section 189 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the
learned Magistrate, doubtless
through inexperience, having observed that it was late, and that the proctor had
already spoken for ten minutes, directed him to finish his remarks in one
minute. The proctor, not unnaturally being aggrieved by this direction, informed
the Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.