KRISTNAPPA CHETTY et al v. HORATALA
Present : Ennis A.C.J. and Jayewardene A.J.
KRISTNAPPA CHETTY et al. v. HORATALA.
181--D. C. Kurunegala, 8,353.
Mortgage in favour of two persons-Address not registered-Action by secondary
mortgagee first-Sale in execution-Subsequent action by primary mortgagee-Sale in
execution-Rights of purchasers under the mortgage decrees-Claim to compensation
by purchaser at second sale-Civil Procedure Code., ss. 643 and 644.
P mortgaged the land in question to F in 1912 and to A in 1914. A put his bond
in suit first, and on a sale in execution purchased the land in November, 1917,
and transferred it to plaintiff in November, 1918. F instituted an action on his
bond in October, 1917, and in execution of the mortgage decree the property was
purchased by defendant by deed dated September, 1919. Neither party complied
with the requirements of sections 643 and 644 of the Civil Procedure Code, and
neither mortgage decree was registered. In an action for declaration of title :
Held, " As plaintiff's title is based on a sale which was prior in date to the
sale in favour of the defendant, the plaintiff's predecessor acquired the title
of the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.