SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SAMARA et al. v. ELVES


Samara Et Al. V. Elves

Present: Bertram C. J. and Ennis J. 1924.

SAMARA et al. v. ELVES
.

 326-D.C.Kandy, 29,151.

Lis pendens-Ordinance No. 29 of 1917-Applicable to cases pending at the date of passing of the Ordinance-Prescription-Uninterrupted possession -Possession need not continue till date of action.

Section 3. of the Land Registration Amendment Ordinance, No. 29 of 1917, which enacts that a lis pendens shall not bind a purchaser unless and until it is registered, applies to a lis pendens initiated but not concluded before the passing of the Ordinance.

N. E. Weerasuriya, for plaintiff, appellant.

H. V. Perera, for defendant, respondent.

February 11,1924. BERTRAM C.J.-

This case raises a question of law. 'That question is whether section 3 of the Land Registration Amendment Ordinance, No. 29 of 1917, as amended by Ordinance No. 21 of the following year, which declares that "a lis pendens shall not bind a purchaser unless and until it is registered," applies to a lis pendens initiated but not concluded before the passing of the Ordinance.

The facts are these : Plaintiffs and a brother (since dead) brought an action against one Babappu (since dead) and













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top