SAMARA et al. v. ELVES
Present: Bertram C. J. and Ennis J. 1924.
SAMARA et al. v. ELVES.
326-D.C.Kandy, 29,151.
Lis pendens-Ordinance No. 29 of 1917-Applicable to cases pending at the date of
passing of the Ordinance-Prescription-Uninterrupted possession -Possession need
not continue till date of action.
Section 3. of the Land Registration Amendment Ordinance, No. 29 of 1917, which
enacts that a lis pendens shall not bind a purchaser unless and until it is
registered, applies to a lis pendens initiated but not concluded before the
passing of the Ordinance.
N. E. Weerasuriya, for plaintiff, appellant.
H. V. Perera, for defendant,
respondent.
February 11,1924. BERTRAM C.J.-
This case raises a question of law. 'That question is whether section 3 of the
Land Registration Amendment Ordinance, No. 29 of 1917, as amended by Ordinance
No. 21 of the following year, which declares that "a lis pendens shall not bind
a purchaser unless and until it is registered," applies to a lis pendens
initiated but not concluded before the passing of the Ordinance.
The facts are these : Plaintiffs and a brother (since dead) brought an action
against one Babappu (since dead) and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.