SAMED v. SEGUTAMBY
Present: Bertram C.J. and Garvin and
Jayewardene A. JJ.
SAMED v. SEGUTAMBY.
358-D. C. Puttalam, 3,543.
Use of fire in agricultural
operations-Spread of fire to neighbouring land -Action for damages-Has plaintiff
to prove negligence on the part of the defendant ?-Contributory negligence.
The defendant cut down the jungle on his land and set fire to it in the
course of some agricultural operations. The fire spread to the plaintiff's land
and damaged his plantation. The plaintiff alleged negligence on the part of the
defendant, and claimed damages. The defendant pleaded contributory negligence on
'the part of the plaintiff in exculpation.
A strip of 30 feet was cleared and reserved on the boundary of the plaintiff's
land in the direction in which the fire would naturally be carried by the
prevailing wind.
Plaintiff himself cleared a corresponding portion on his own land as an
additional precaution. Neither side took the precaution to clear a strip to
prevent the fire spreading in the event of a defection of the wind. The fire
spread sideways, and got out of control.
The District Judge held that plaintiff had entirely failed to prove neglig
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.