SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ABEYSUNDERA v. BABUNA et al.


Abeysundera V. Babuna Et Al.

Present: Ennis A. C. J. and Schneider J.

ABEYSUNDERA v. BABUNA et al.

226-D. C. Matara, 374.

Res judicata-Dismissal of partition action for non-prosecution

Subsequent action for partition of same land-Civil Procedure Code, ss. 5, 6, and 207.

The dismissal of a partition action for non-prosecution is no bar against & subsequent action for the partition of the same land.

The cause of action upon which a. partition action is based is inconvenience of common ownership, which is a recurring one.

APPEAL from an order of the District Judge of Matara dismissing an action for partition on the ground that it. was barred by a previous action for the partition of the same land.

It appeared from a certified copy of the proceedings of the previous action, produced by counsel, that the action had been dismissed before the day of trial had been fixed, and even before some of the defendants had been served with novice.

Samarawickreme (with him H. V. Perera), for plaintiff, appellant.

R. L. Bartholemeusz,
for 26th defendant, respondent.

February 17, 1925. Ennis A. C. J. -

This is an appeal by a plaintiff in a partition action, whose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top