SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BARTHOLOMEUSZ v. HUTT


Bartholomeusz V. Hutt

Present. Schneider J. and Jayewardene A. J.

BARTHOLOMEUSZ v. HUTT.

184-D. G. Kandy, 26.

Waste Lands Ordinance-Claim for half-improved value-Reference to Court-Powers. of District Court-Statement of claim-Parties to reference-Ordinance No. 1 of 1897, ss. 6 (b) and 8.

Where a claim made under the Waste Lands Ordinance before the Assistant Government Agent that a land be settled on the, claimant upon his paying the half-improved value was referred to the District Court, and where the District Judge declared the claimant absolutely entitled to a portion of the land in claim.

Held, that the. Court had no power to grant the claimant a larger right than that claimed by him in the statement of claim.

Obiter-The proceedings in Court should be confined to the persons named in the reference, except in the special case contemplated by section 8 of the Ordinance.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Kandy in a reference made to Court under the Waste Lands Ordinance, by the Assistant Government Agent of Kandy, of a claim made by the first respondent that an allotment of land called Welikanda of the extent of 5 acres 3 roods and 8. 8 per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top