MOONESINGHE v. PEREIRA
Present: Jayewardene
A.J.
MOONESINGHE v. PEREIRA et al,
66-C. B. Colombo, 19,715.
Advocate-Action for refund of fees rot maintainable-English law.
An advocate cannot sue or be sued by a client in respect of fees due to him or
paid to him.
An advocate in Ceylon stands towards his clients in the same legal position as a
barrister-at-law in England.
The principle laid down in Kennedy v. Broun 1[1 (1863) 7 L. T. 626 (630).]
applied.
The rules of the Roman-Dutch law on- the subject have no application to local
advocates.
THE
plaintiff through his proctor retained the
defendants' testator, who was a barrister-at-law, an advocate of the Supreme
Court, and a King's Counsel, to appear for him in a case in appeal. Before the
appeal could be heard, the advocate died, and it is admitted that no work was
done for the fee paid to him. After the death of the advocate, the plaintiff
requested the defendants, the advocate's executors, to return the fee which the
defendants refused. The plaintiff instituted the present action for the recovery
of the fee, and the learned Commissioner of Requests gave judgment for the
plaintiff.
E. J. Samarawi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.