SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

REX v. FERNANDO


Rex V. Fernando

Present: Maartensz A.J.

REX
v. FERNANDO.

 3-D.C.(Crim.) Colombo, 7,402.

    Abetment-Causing a woman to miscarry-Act abetted physically impossible-Penal Code, ss. 102 and 303.

A person may be convicted of the abetment of an offence under section 303 of the Penal Code, viz., causing a woman to miscarry, even where there is no evidence that woman was pregnant, provided that the accused believed she was in that condition.

APPEAL by the 2nd accused from a conviction by the District- Judge of Colombo. The facts are fully set out in the judgment.

Soertsz (with him Tisseveerasinghe and Weerasinghe), for 2nd accused appellant.

Obeyesekere, CO., for Crown, respondent.

April 2, 1925. MAARTENSZ A. J.-

The two accused in this case were indicted on the following charges:-

(1) The 1st accused, Rose Millicent Fox, with voluntarily causing herself to miscarry, an offence punishable under section 303 of the Penal Code.

(2) The 2nd accused, B. H. Fernando, with aiding and abetting be commission of the aforesaid offence, which was committed in consequence of such abetment, thereby committing an offence punishable under sections 303 and 102 of the Penal



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top