SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UKKU MENIKA v. APPUHAMY


Ukku Menika V. Appuhamy

Present: Jayewardene A. J.

UKKU MENIKA
v. APPUHAMY.

211-C. R. Badulla, 4,556.

    Decisory oath-Undertaking by plaintiff and his witnesses-Failure of one witness to take the oath-Dismissal of action.

An undertaking to refer the decision of an action to the test of an oath may provide that the oath be taken by a party to the action, a witness, or by a party and a witness.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Commissioner of Requests, Badulla. The facts appear from the judgment.

H. V. Perera, for plaintiff, appellant.

R. C. Fonseka, for defendants, respondent.

October 27, 1925. JAYEWARDENE A.J.-

In this case the plaintiff sued the defendants for declaration of title to a portion of a field called Gedera-arawa. The defendants filed answer claiming the portion in question as a part of their land Narangahawatta.

On the day of trial, after a good deal of evidence had been recorded, the defendants challenged the plaintiff, Geneterala, ex Arachchi, and the Arachchi of Morahela to take their oaths at Kataragama Dewala " that the plaintiff cultivated the land in dispute as a paddy field till he planted it with plantains and other plants about fi







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top