UKKU MENIKA v. APPUHAMY
Present: Jayewardene A. J.
UKKU MENIKA v. APPUHAMY.
211-C. R. Badulla, 4,556.
Decisory oath-Undertaking by plaintiff and his witnesses-Failure of one witness
to take the oath-Dismissal of action.
An undertaking to refer the decision of an action to the test of an oath may
provide that the oath be taken by a party to the action, a witness, or by a
party and a witness.
APPEAL
from a judgment of the Commissioner of Requests, Badulla. The facts
appear from the judgment.
H. V. Perera, for plaintiff, appellant.
R. C. Fonseka, for defendants, respondent.
October 27, 1925. JAYEWARDENE A.J.-
In this case the plaintiff sued the defendants for declaration of title to a
portion of a field called Gedera-arawa. The defendants filed answer claiming the
portion in question as a part of their land Narangahawatta.
On the day of trial, after a good deal of evidence had been recorded, the
defendants challenged the plaintiff, Geneterala, ex Arachchi, and the Arachchi
of Morahela to take their oaths at Kataragama Dewala " that the plaintiff
cultivated the land in dispute as a paddy field till he planted it with
plantains and other plants about fi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.