PAULU v. RENGISHAMY
Present: Branch C.J. and
Maartensz A.J.
PAULU v. RENGISHAMY.
137-D. C. Galle, 22,221.
Partition
action-Commission to partition-Notice by the Commissioner to the
public-Ordinance No. 10 of 1863, s. 5.
In a partition action the notice given by the Commissioner, in terms of the
proviso to section 5 of the Ordinance, of his intention to partition the land,
must be a notice to the public.
It is not a sufficient compliance with the terms of the section to give such
notice to the parties only.
The failure to give such notice to the public deprives a partition decree of its
conclusive character.
APPEAL
from an order of the District Judge of Galle
refusing -the appellant to intervene in an action for the partition of a land
called Galpotte-elamanana. The appellant moved to set aside the final decree
either by way of appeal or in revision on the ground, among others, that the
Commissioner who was appointed to carry out the commission had not complied with
the terms of section 5 of the Partition Ordinance, in that no notice as required
by the proviso to that section was given. It would seem that no notice was fixed
on the land; there was
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.