SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

KING v. BELINDA


King V. Belinda

Present: Jayewardene A.J.

KING
v. BILINDA et al.

123, 123A-D. C. (Crim.) Kegalla, 2,386.

    Confession-Failure of Magistrate to comply with requirements of the Code-No memorandum or signature of accused-Admissibility- Criminal Procedure Code, ss. 134, 302-404.

Where a Police Magistrate records the confession of an accused person, without complying with any of the requirements of sections 134 and 302 of the Criminal Procedure Code,-

Held, the confession was inadmissible in evidence.

Semble, in such a case it is not possible to resort to section 424 of the Criminal Procedure Code to make good the omission.

Observations as to the procedure to be adopted when an accused person who wishes to make a confession is produced before a Magistrate by a Police Officer.

THE accused were charged under section 456 of the Penal Code with forgery of a deed. On the deed, purporting to be signed by one Horatala, as grantor, a civil action was brought in the Court of Requests of Gampola.- When the civil case was terminated, Horatala, who denied having executed the deed sent a petition regarding it, and a police investigation was directed. As a result of thi




















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top