SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SERGEANT HOOPER v. BASNAYAKE


Sergeant Hooper V. Basnayake

1926 Present: Jayewardene A. J.

SERGEANT HOOPER v. BASNAYAKE.

468-M. C. Colombo, 3,076.

Vehicles Ordinance, No. 4 of 1916-By-law made under section 32- Owners' liability for non-compliance with by-law.

Where a motor car not fitted with two independent brakes in good working order, as required by by-law 18 (10), was used on a public thoroughfare,

Held, that the owner of the car was guilty of an offence, irrespective of the liability of the driver.

APPEAL from an acquittal by the Municipal Court of Colombo.

Brito-Muttunayagam, C. C.,
for Crown, appellant.

R. L. Pereira. for accused, respondent.

October 5, 1926. JAYEWARDENE  A .J.-

This is an appeal by the Attorney-General against an acquittal. The accused, who is the owner of motor omnibus No. C 6088; was charged with having failed to have two independent brakes in good working order in breach of section 18 (10) of the Motor by-laws, an offence punishable under section 154 of the same by-laws.

The learned Municipal Magistrate found that the brakes were ineffective, but held that the evidence fell far short of the kind of proof that was necessary to establish a charge against the























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top