SERGEANT HOOPER v. BASNAYAKE
1926 Present: Jayewardene A. J.
SERGEANT HOOPER v. BASNAYAKE.
468-M. C. Colombo, 3,076.
Vehicles Ordinance, No. 4 of 1916-By-law made under section 32- Owners'
liability for non-compliance with by-law.
Where a motor car not fitted with two independent brakes in good working
order, as required by by-law 18 (10), was used on a public thoroughfare,
Held, that the owner of the car was guilty of an offence, irrespective of the
liability of the driver.
APPEAL from an acquittal by the Municipal Court of
Colombo.
Brito-Muttunayagam, C. C., for Crown, appellant.
R. L. Pereira. for accused, respondent.
October 5, 1926. JAYEWARDENE A .J.-
This is an appeal by the Attorney-General against an acquittal. The accused, who
is the owner of motor omnibus No. C 6088; was charged with having failed to have
two independent brakes in good working order in breach of section 18 (10) of the
Motor by-laws, an offence punishable under section 154 of the same by-laws.
The learned Municipal Magistrate found that the brakes were ineffective, but
held that the evidence fell far short of the kind of proof that was necessary to
establish a charge against the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.