SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MENIKHAMY v. SUDDANA


Menikhamy V. Suddana

1926 Present: Dalton J. and Maartensz A .J.

MENIKHAMY
v. SUDDANA et al..

 238-D. C. Kurunegdla, 9,696.

Kandyan law-Acquired property-Inheritance-Preferential right of brothers over sisters.

Where a Kandyan died without issue leaving him surviving two brothers and two sisters.

Held, that the brothers were entitled to his acquired property to the exclusion of the sisters.

Dullewe v. Dullewe et al
.1 followed.

ACTION for declaration of title to 7/16th share of a land called Kudapelessahena, the original owner of which was one Dingira, who died leaving him surviving two sisters Saru and Tikirathi, and two brothers Suddana, 1st defendant, and Kira. By

1 5 Leader L. R. 39.

purchase the plaintiff became entitled to 7/16th of the half share of the two sisters. The 2nd defendant acquired the interest of the brother Kira. The defendants contended that the property, being acquired property, was inherited by the brothers to the exclusion of the sisters. The learned District Judge dismissed the plaintiff's action

H. V. Perera for plaintiffs, appellant.

Weerasooriya
, for defendant, respondent.

December 17, 1926. DALTON J.-

This appeal raises an i























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top