SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HALL v. PELMADULLA VALLEY TEA AND RUBBER CO. LTD.


Hall V. Pelmadulla Valley Tea And Rubber Co., Ltd.,

1927 Present: Fisher C. J. and Garvin J.

HALL
v. PELMADULLA VALLEY TEA AND RUBBER CO., LTD., et al.

326-D. C. Ratnapura, 4,107.

Contract-Agreement to transfer land-Registration-Sale to plaintiff- Notice-Tenses Ordinance, No. 9 of 1917, s. 93.

By a notarial contract, the added defendant, after reciting that lie had agreed to sell 1,000 acres of land to the defendant company, bound himself to give effect to that agreement and to deduct a good and valid title.

In pursuance of the agreement the company was placed in possession of certain blocks of land which form the subject- matter of the present action.

The plaintiff, with notice of the said agreement  purchased  the land and sought to eject the company therefrom.

Held, that the contract was an existing enforceable contract within the meaning of section 93 of the Trusts Ordinance and that the plaintiff was bound to hold the property for the benefit of the company to the extent necessary to give effect to the contract.

The proviso to section 93 of the Trusts Ordinance does not prevent the application of the section to contracts affecting immovable property, w
































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top