RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR v. BARFI LALL
1927 Present: Garvin J. and
Maartensz A.J.
RAMANATHAN CHETTIAR v. BARFI LALL.
20-D. C. Jaffna,5,870.
Official administrator-Application for administration by a creditor-Appointment of official administrator-Letters of administration pendente lite.
An official administrator should be appointed only when there is no fit and
proper person to be appointed administrator.
Where proceedings are pending for the appointment of an administrator it is open
to the Court to appoint an administrator pendente lite.
Neemath Umma v. Abdul Wahab
1
[(1919) 6 C. W. R. 288.] followed.
APPLICATION
for letters of administration for the intestate estate of Mathan Lall by the
appellant .is creditor of the estate. The facts appear from the judgment.
H. V. Perera (with Navaratnam and Nadarajah), for
appellant.
Croos DaBrera, for 1st respondent.
Hayley (with Rajaratnam), for 2nd respondent.
Joseph (with H. H. Bartholomeusz and R. L. Bartholomeusz),
for 3rd respondent.
July 13, 1927. MAARTENSZ A.J.-
The appellant in this case purports to be creditor of the intestate estate of
Bajanamand Mathan Lall, late of Khurja in India.
The intestate and hi
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.