HORAN v. NARAYAN CHETTY
1927 Present: Drieberg
A.J.
HORAN v. NARAYAN CHETTY.
435-M. C. Colombo, 1,226.
Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance-Closing
order served during lease.-Allowing the house. to be used for human habitation-
Liability of owner-Ordinance .No. 19 of 1915, s. 79.
The owner of a house, who had leased it on an indenture Wore a closing order was
made in respect of it, cannot lie convicted under section 79 (1) of the Housing
and Town Improvement Ordinance of having allowed the house lo be used for human
habitation during the period of the closing order.
APPEAL from n conviction by the Municipal
.Magistrate of Colombo.
Navaratnam, for accused, appellant.
Keuneman (with Villava Rayen), for respondent, complainant
September 12, 1927. DRIEBERG A.J.?
This is an appeal by the accused-appellant from a conviction under section 79
(1) of the Housing and Town Improvement Ordinance, No, 19 of 1915, of having
allowed certain dwelling houses to be used for human habitation while a closing
order was operative. The accused has been fined Rs, 200, and a further sum of
Rs. 10 a day from July 27, 1927, so long as the houses are occupied while the
closing or
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.