SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SILVA v. DAVITH et al.


Silva V. Davith Et Al.,

1928 Present: Garvin and Drieberg JJ.

SILVA v. DAVITH et al.

226, 226A-D. C. (Inty.) Kalutara, 9,873.

Registration of deeds-Ola deed of 1815-Starting point of prescriptions-Mortgage action-Lis pendens-Non-registration of decree-Transfer pendente lite-Subsequent purchaser.

An ola instrument of 1815, which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance No. 6 of 1866, may be admitted in evidence for the purpose of establishing a starting point for a prescriptive title.

An unregistered decree in a mortgage action instituted prior to Ordinance No. 29 of 1917 (Registration of lis pendent) operates as a valid charge against a transfer effected by the mortgagor pendants lite.

Where a purchaser from such transferee obtained his conveyance after the decree and registered it,-

Held, that the registration of His conveyance did not give it priority over the unregistered decree.

APPEAL from a judgment of the District Judge of Kalutara. The question in dispute in case No. 226 is stated by the learned Judge as follows:-" The plaintiff's title is based on a Dutch grant of 1704. The contesting defendants claim the right by pre

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top